Stop policing production

Your design tokens are one file in your product repo. Every change ships as a contrast-checked pull request. Drift isn't caught late. It's structurally impossible.

Private beta. No spam. One email when we open access. Privacy

This demo is live. The page reads from the JSON on the right, so your edit restyles the site you are looking at. Pick an accent, drag the radius. The pale swatch fails contrast, so the gate blocks it and the page keeps its last passing value.

2 tokens|light mode
color.accent on bg.surface6.8:1aa
tokens.json
{ "color.accent": { "$type": "color", "$value": "#004cdf" }, "radius.base": { "$type": "dimension", "$value": "4px" } }

You made the decision in thirty seconds. You'll be enforcing it for a year

A color. A radius. A spacing step. Approved, documented, handed off. Then the real job starts: the DM asking for the exact hex, the QA pass that catches the wrong gray, the accessibility audit that finds a contrast failure that was never in your file.

Every tool in your stack exists to manage the gap between design and production. And even when you make peace with it, the people above you don't: drift is what a CEO notices in a board demo, and "token fix" is a line a client reads on the invoice.

Kampa removes the gap. There is nothing left to police.

What no other token tool does

Zero drift, by construction

tokens.json lives in your product repository. Your design tool stays downstream of it. Your docs read from it. Production reads from it. So do your AI tools: canonical data they run against, not a DESIGN.md they skim and hallucinate around. There is no sync step, so there is nothing to fall out of sync.

A contrast gate that never fails silently

Every color token is checked against its declared backgrounds at design time. You decide what the gate does: block the commit where compliance demands it, warn where it doesn't. Exemptions are explicit and on the record, so you can ship low contrast when the design calls for it. As a decision, never as an accident.

A real pull request,
not a copy of one

Token sync tools borrow the language of engineering: diffs, releases, approvals, rollbacks. But review happens in their app, under their roles, on their audit trail. Your repo receives the result.

In Kampa, a token change is a pull request in your repository. Your reviewers, your branch protection, your merge button. The audit trail is your Git history, which outlives every vendor, including us.

There is a newer promise too: an agent that edits your codebase and opens the pull request for you. It proves designers belong in the repo. But an agent ships whatever it happened to write, and someone still reads every line to be sure. That is why Kampa exists. A change here is not generated code. It is one validated artifact, contrast-checked before the pull request exists. Your engineers review a design decision, not a diff they have to decode.

Tokens today.
The whole product tomorrow

Every level of the product will live as production code, and every change will ship the way you made it. Tokens are where it starts.

Tokensavailable first

Color, type, spacing. The part you join the waitlist for.

Components

Buttons, cards, inputs. Every state, every binding, live.

Sections

Real layout, assembled from real components.

Screens

Whole pages, end to end, as the thing that ships.

The productthe horizon

Say "this feels too cold," and watch the live product warm up.

Stop drawing pictures of your design system

Tokens as production code. Changes as pull requests. Contrast checked before anything ships.

Free for solo use when we launch. Paid plans for teams. Privacy

Who's building this

I'm Tonda Pospíšil. Twenty years designing fintech and enterprise products, most of it watching approved design decisions degrade on their way to production. Kampa is the tool I needed on every one of those teams. I'm building it solo, with a small group of pilot testers.

Tonda on LinkedIn